Data imputation - Revision history

Hah at 09:07, 9 September 2009

2009-09-09T09:07:28Z

Hah at 15:49, 8 September 2009

2009-09-08T15:49:26Z

Hah at 15:44, 8 September 2009

2009-09-08T15:44:33Z

Hah at 15:43, 8 September 2009

2009-09-08T15:43:53Z

Hah: New page: A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearne...

2009-09-08T15:36:57Z

New page: A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearne...

New page

A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (entirely represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (all possible plots are represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.
+A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can though be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (all possible plots are represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.
-This is done in the first dialog box [?, not really sure what's done here...].
+Therefore, a desired within stand-variation regarding certain variables can be stated prior to imputation. Another way to obtain more realistic representation of a stand by imputed plots is by the [[Import_of_FMPP_data|"Forking method"]], a part of the FMPP.
-[Is it the imputation of ages and heights to calliper-trees, as in FMPP? But isn't this handled by the control table-settings?]
+[Is it the imputation of age and height to calliper-trees, as in FMPP? But isn't this handled within the system, following settings in control tables?]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 8 September 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This is done in the first dialog box [?, not really sure what's done here...].		This is done in the first dialog box [?, not really sure what's done here...].
		+
		+	[Is it the imputation of ages and heights to calliper-trees, as in FMPP? But isn't this handled by the control table-settings?]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 8 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (all possible plots are represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.		A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (all possible plots are represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.

−	This is done in the first dialog box[?, not really sure what's done here...].	+	This is done in the first dialog box [?, not really sure what's done here...].

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 8 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (~~entirely~~ represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.	+	A variety of '''Imputation techniques''' are available. The ''k''NN estimation method is one, or actually several (depending on the type of information being used, the definition of nearness, the weighting procedure, etc.). Imputation can be regarded as the opposite of amputation; information in a specific format is added to ensure functionality. A straightforward way is to impute plots from a reference data set to a stand described by totals and average values in a register. The imputation is done when values at the stand-level corresponds to those at the plot-level. Unrealistic stands, with more or less no variation (too homogenous), can be estimated if 1. only one plot per stand is imputed, 2. if more than one plot per stand is imputed but the reference data set is "complete" (all possible plots are represented) and a specific plot can be imputed to the same stand more than once, or 3. if no measures are taken into account, to secure a certain variation.
		+
		+	This is done in the first dialog box[?, not really sure what's done here...].